2008 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Matiz would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (229 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1530 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (410 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. 2010 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2008 Chevrolet Matiz has manual transmission. 2008 Chevrolet Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Matiz | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Matiz | Commander |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 410 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 86.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 189 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 18.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 2305 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 14.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 78 L |
