2008 Dodge Charger vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Charger (191 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1843 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Charger (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Dodge Charger | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Charger | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2736 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2060 mm |
