2008 Ford Ranger vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Ranger | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2297 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2430 mm |