2008 Holden UTE vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 287 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. 1982 Nissan Pulsar has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2008 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Nissan Pulsar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Holden UTE | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | UTE | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 357 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 530 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |