2008 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 173 kg more than 2008 Hyundai Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Hyundai Matrix. (142 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hyundai Matrix | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Hyundai | Mazda |
Model | Matrix | 3 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1127 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |