2008 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 3,699 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2002 Volvo XC90. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (351 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-350. (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu I-350 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | I-350 | XC90 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3699 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 351 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 72 L |