2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1990 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1221 kg more than 1990 Opel Omega.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Opel Omega. (169 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1990 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Jeep | Opel |
| Model | Cherokee | Omega |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 169 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2520 kg | 1299 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 70 L |
