2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 210 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 423 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Cherokee. (307 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Jeep | Jeep |
Model | Cherokee | Compass |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 307 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |