2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1962 MG MGA
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG MGA would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1510 kg more than 1962 MG MGA.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 MG MGA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG MGA. (104 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG MGA. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1962 MG MGA has manual transmission. 1962 MG MGA will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1962 MG MGA | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Commander | MGA |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1489 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |