2008 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2005 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B2300 would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B2300. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B2300.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda B2300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Wrangler | 2005 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | B2300 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3979 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.3 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |