2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2007 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden UTE would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 3. (257 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 3.
Because 2007 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (380 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 2007 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 3 | UTE |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 6000 cc |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |