2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1969 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1969 Steyr Haflinger. (27 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 734 kg more than 1969 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Steyr Haflinger. (44 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1969 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Mazda | Steyr |
Model | 6 | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 642 cc |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 44 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1384 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1510 mm |