2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alfa Romeo 146. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 would be higher. Both 2008 Mazda 6 and 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 are equipped with a 1,596 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1996 Alfa Romeo 146. (103 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Alfa Romeo 146.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Alfa Romeo 146. (134 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Alfa Romeo 146.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
Make | Mazda | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 6 | 146 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 103 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 134 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 72 mm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |