2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-250. (265 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 659 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-250. (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | CX-9 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 72 L |