2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (221 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 520 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | CLK | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |
