2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 715 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1963 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1963 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | CLK | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3198 cc | 1295 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |
