2008 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 3,199 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E (315 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chrysler 200. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz E | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chrysler |
| Model | E | 200 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2400 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
| Torque | 315 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4869 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2766 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |
