2008 Nissan Livina vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2008 Nissan Livina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 137 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Nissan Livina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Livina (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Livina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Livina | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Livina | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 1998 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 50 L |