2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (124 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Volvo 144. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan X-Trail | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | X-Trail | 144 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 124 HP |
Torque | 316 Nm | 167 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |