2008 Volvo C30 vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo C30 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Because 1980 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Volvo C30 | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | C30 | 164 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2519 cc | 2664 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3350 mm |