2009 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo GTV is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Alfa Romeo GTV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Alfa Romeo GTV (163 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo GTV should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Alfa Romeo GTV weights approximately 410 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Alfa Romeo GTV (206 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Alfa Romeo GTV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | GTV | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 18.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.4 seconds | 12.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 48 L |