2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (571 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mazda |
Model | DBS | Tribute |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 571 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.4 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 62 L |