2009 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 535 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A3 | HRT |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 815 Nm |
Top Speed | 234 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |