2009 Audi S6 vs. 1986 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S6 (435 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 320 more horse power than 1986 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Toyota Celica.
Because 2009 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi S6 (540 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Toyota Celica. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi S6 | 1986 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | S6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 540 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2620 mm |