2009 Bentley Arnage vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2009 Bentley Arnage is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 6,760 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Bentley Arnage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Bentley Arnage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Bentley Arnage. (738 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Bentley Arnage. 2009 Bentley Arnage has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Bentley Arnage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Bentley Arnage | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Bentley | Holden |
| Model | Arnage | HRT |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6760 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 493 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 738 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Top Speed | 288 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
