2009 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 261 more horse power than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 2011 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | BMW | Daewoo |
| Model | M3 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
