2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1966 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1075 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 1966 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | BLS | 2CV |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 65 L |