2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 460 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac BLS | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
| Model | BLS | Sundance |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |
