2009 Cadillac BLS vs. 2006 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet HHR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet HHR would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac BLS | 2006 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | BLS | HHR |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2199 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 68 L |