2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 BMW 850
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 850 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 BMW 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1992 BMW 850. (296 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 850.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 850 (450 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac CTS | 1992 BMW 850 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | CTS | 850 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3599 cc | 4988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 52 L |