2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 725 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (250 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Cadillac CTS 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara
Make Cadillac Suzuki
Model CTS Grand Vitara
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3175 cc 2737 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 250 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 75 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 66 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]