2009 Cadillac STS-V vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 328 more horse power than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Cadillac STS-V | 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | STS-V | MCC |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4376 cc | 2962 cc |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |