2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1955 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1955 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | HHR | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4785 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3000 mm |