2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1980 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1980 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | HHR | Taft |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2030 mm |