2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 314 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 610 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (498 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 466 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Tahoe | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 5999 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 332 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 498 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 66 L |
