2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (291 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1172 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (306 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Tahoe | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4800 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2420 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |