2009 Citroen C2 vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Citroen C2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 261 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C2.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C2. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C2 | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | C2 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 597 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 101.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2750 mm |
