2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (190 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lotus Eclat.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Challenger | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Challenger | Eclat |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 67 L |