2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Charger | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
