2009 Dodge Nitro vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Dodge Nitro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Dodge Nitro would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Nitro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Nitro (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Bravo. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Nitro should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Nitro weights approximately 610 kg more than 2011 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Nitro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Nitro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Nitro (314 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Nitro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Fiat Bravo. 2009 Dodge Nitro has automatic transmission and 2011 Fiat Bravo has manual transmission. 2011 Fiat Bravo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Nitro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Nitro | 2011 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Nitro | Bravo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 197 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 58 L |