2009 Ford Escape vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 242 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (302 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Escape | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Escape | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 171 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 302 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 132 L |
