2009 Ford Ka vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 544 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ka | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ka | Crestline |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 4453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2940 mm |
