2009 Ford Maverick vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Ford Maverick is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Maverick (194 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Maverick weights approximately 305 kg more than 2002 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Maverick (265 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (105 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane. 2009 Ford Maverick has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Maverick will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Maverick | 2002 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Maverick | Megane |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1783 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.8 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |
