2009 Hummer H2 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2009 Hummer H2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 6,199 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hummer H2 (393 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (266 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hummer H2 weights approximately 963 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hummer H2 (564 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (450 Nm). This means 2009 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Hummer H2 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Hummer Jeep
Model H2 Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6199 cc 4701 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 393 HP 266 HP
Torque 564 Nm 450 Nm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2903 kg 1940 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 2070 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 2020 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 3130 mm 2700 mm