2009 Hummer H2 vs. 2006 Maybach 62
To start off, 2009 Hummer H2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Maybach 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Maybach 62 would be higher. At 6,199 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Maybach 62 (543 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2009 Hummer H2. (393 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Hummer H2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hummer H2 weights approximately 98 kg more than 2006 Maybach 62.
Because 2009 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Maybach 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Maybach 62 (900 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Hummer H2. (564 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2006 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Hummer H2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Hummer H2 | 2006 Maybach 62 | |
| Make | Hummer | Maybach |
| Model | H2 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6199 cc | 5513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 393 HP | 543 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 564 Nm | 900 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2903 kg | 2805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 6170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 16 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 121 L | 110 L |
