2009 Jaguar XF vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jaguar XF | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XF | Ranger |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |