2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 538 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Jeep | Zastava |
| Model | Compass | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2010 mm |
