2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2005 Suzuki X2
To start off, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki X2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki X2 would be higher.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2005 Suzuki X2 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Grand Cherokee | X2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2650 mm |