2009 Lada 21 vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada 21 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 21, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (131 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada 21 | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 21 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 131 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2480 mm |