2009 Lada 21 vs. 2004 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac Montana (185 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 965 kg more than 2009 Lada 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Pontiac Montana is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Lada 21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac Montana (298 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (131 Nm). This means 2004 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21. 2004 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2009 Lada 21 has manual transmission. 2009 Lada 21 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lada 21 | 2004 Pontiac Montana | |
| Make | Lada | Pontiac |
| Model | 21 | Montana |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 3392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 95 L |
